
EANM Executive Secretariat
Hollandstrasse 14 / Mezzanine,
A-1020 Vienna, Austria
Phone: +43-(0)1-212 80 30
Fax: +43-(0)1-212 80 30-9
E-Mail: office@eanm.org
Abstract Detail
« back
2nd ISRTRD - Physics 1: Quantitative Analysis & Treatment Planning
Sunday October 1, 2006 11h - 13h
Room: MC 2
| 96 | Development and validation of an organ residence time estimation method for high dose Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy E. C. Frey, B. He, G. Sgouros, I. W. Flinn, R. L. Wahl; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, UNITED STATES. |
Aim: We are currently engaged
in a dose escalation trial to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for a
myeloablative Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy regimen with autologous stem
cell transplant. In this study, the escalation variable is dose to critical
organs. Thus, accurate estimation of organ residence times is essential. The
goal of this work was to develop and validate a method for estimating organ
residence time of the In-111 labeled antibody for use in this study.Materials
and Methods: In the method, anterior/posterior planar scans are acquired at 5
time points plus abdominal and thoracic SPECT/CT acquisitions at 24 hrs post
injection. SPECT images were reconstructed using a quantitative SPECT (Q-SPECT)
reconstruction method based on iterative reconstruction including compensation
for attenuation, scatter, and the collimator-detector response. Planar scans
were processed using scatter subtraction and geometric mean methods. Organ volumes-of-interest
were defined using the registered CT and SPECT images and regions of interest
were manually defined on the planar scans. Organ time-activity curves (TACs)
were estimated from the planar scans and, for the hybrid method, rescaled to
pass through the organ activity estimated from the Q-SPECT images. The
residence times were estimated by integrating exponential functions fitted to
the TACs. The method was evaluated using physical phantom experiments and Monte
Carlo simulation studies by comparing accuracies of estimated residence times
for the liver, the dose-limiting organ in all patients to-date. The planar and
hybrid methods were also compared using data from 12 patient studies.Results:
The errors in the 24 hr estimates of liver activity were 1.3% and 13% for the
Q-SPECT and planar methods, respectively. The planar method resulted in a 19%
underestimation in the liver compared to 8% for the hybrid method. In the
patient studies, the difference between the planar and hybrid estimates of the
residence times was 11% +/- 14%. Of importance, the variation in the accuracy
over the patient population was larger than the average difference. Large
variations in accuracy of dose estimates could result in large variations in
the administered dose compared to the true dose, and thus errors in estimating
the MTD.Conclusions: We conclude that, the hybrid planar/SPECT estimation
method provided a substantial improvement compared to residence time estimates
based on planar images. This methodology has been applied in the ongoing dose
escalation study where a 28 Gy dose to the liver has been administered to three
patients without adverse reactions.
« back

